Home
Monday, 01 August 2016 20:49

Lexmark ES Rebounds in Q2

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Lexmark's Q2 results for its Enterprise Software (ES) division do not appear to be terrible. On Friday, the Lexington, KY-based MFP vendor announced its Q2 2016 results, and while overall earnings were disappointing, ES seemed to have rebounded from a very disappointing Q1. For Q2, Lexmark reported ES revenue of $167M, which represented an 11% YOY increase. But, before you get too excited, Q2 2015 only contained about a month and a half worth of Kofax revenue, as Lexmark's acquisition of the capture market software leader closed in mid-May last year. In the first complete quarter of Kofax revenue (Q3 2015), Lexmark reported ES revenue of $165M.

Of course, immediately upon announcing its Q3 numbers last year, Lexmark announced it was looking at selling either the whole or parts of its company, which sent the ES business into a bit of a tailspin. Things bottomed out in Q1 of this year when Lexmark reported ES revenue of just $143M, a 14% decline from the combined revenue of Lexmark's Perceptive Software and Kofax (which were combined to create Lexmark ES) in Q1 2015.

So, it's good to see that now Lexmark's ES business appears back on track in spite of April's announcement that the entirety of Lexmark was being acquired by a group of China-based investors led by Apex Technology Co., Ltd. and PAG Asia Capital. A week previous to the Q2 earnings announcement, it was announced that Lexmark shareholders had approved the "merger agreement." There was a lot of speculation that being owned by a Chinese entity could adversely affect enterprise software sales due to concerns about security related to a lack of regulation in China. In my research and conversations, I could find nothing to substantiate these concerns and apparently they didn't negatively affect sales in Q2.

I'm not exactly sure what led to the turnaround from Q1, except that perhaps once the deal for the acquisition was in place, the ES team was better able to focus on its business. ES President Reynolds Bish had told me in a conversation at Lexmark ES's Inspire event in early April, that the distractions related to a potential acquisition had taken a toll on his organization.

Of course, rumors continue to swirl that Lexmark ES will still be spun off and a decent quarter like Q2 should help increase its potential value. Although it's still hard to see Lexmark recouping the approximately $2B in spent rolling up ES in the six-year period from 2010 through 2015.

 

 

Read 1331 times Last modified on Wednesday, 03 August 2016 17:27

Leave a comment

 

 

Featured Premium DIR Articles

About Me

Editor/Publisher of a business and marketing newsletter focused on the maturing document capture and imaging industry.

DIR Free Premium Trial

Sponsor

Upcoming Events

AIIM 2017: March 13-16, Orlando, FL

CapServe 17: April 5-6, Hilton Washington Dulles Airport

Harvey Spencer Associates Capture 2017: Oct. 4-5, Glen Cove Mansion, Long Island

Contributed Content

Contributed Press Releases

Contributed PDF Content

  • Ricoh IDS More than a Digital Mailroom

    We’ve heard the term “digital mailroom” tossed around our market for past 15 years. It brings to mind visions of scanning incoming mail and delivering it to recipients as document images. Ricoh’s new Intelligent Delivery Services (IDS) strives to be more than that.

    Read more ...  
  • Prepared Remarks: Nuance Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2016

    Nuance is providing a copy of these prepared remarks, in combination with its press release, to provide shareholders and analysts with additional time and detail for analyzing our results in advance of our quarterly conference call.

    Read more ...  
  • M-Files Ready for Next Generation of ECM

    M-Files VP of Marketing Greg Milliken discusses the "end of the beginning" of the ECM market as he sees it, and explains how his up and coming software company is already stepping in with next-generation solutions.

    Read more ...
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-1501216-1', 'auto'); ga('send', 'pageview');